Well, it appears that this putative “Library Blog” is well on its way to becoming a “What Music is Aaron Listening to Today, as if Anyone Cares Blog.” Truth be told, I haven’t been paying much attention to library issues recently, but a post on BCK’s blog brought to my attention new developments regarding our old friend, the USA Patriot Act. (Specifically, the provision of said act most pertinent to libraries, Section 215.)
Section 215 allows law enforcement officials to view a library patron’s book borrowing and internet browsing records by issuing something called a National Security Letter (NSL), a type of warrant that requires no judicial oversight. Moreover, the NSL comes with a built-in gag order, so that library staff who’ve been issued one can’t reveal to anybody that the cops have ever been snooping around the library.
Recently, some librarians have decided to fight back. A group in Connecticut that was issued a NSL for library records filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the built-in gag order, since it ironically prevented those same librarians from having any part in the then-ongoing debate in Congress over whether to reauthorize the Patriot Act. A judge lifted the gag order, but the government fought it in court. By the time the government finally relented and allowed the gag order to be lifted, debate in Congress on the USAPA was already over, a fact the librarians complained about bitterly:
“Free public libraries exist in this country to promote democracy by allowing the public to inform itself on the issues of the day. The idea that the government can secretly investigate what the public is informing itself about is chilling.”
Christian noted with irony that the gag order was lifted only after Congress voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act.
“The fact that I can speak now is a little like being permitted to call the fire department only after a building has burned to the ground,” he said.
In other Patriot Act-related news, the librarians in my current environs of Seattle have passed a resolution calling for the resignation or impeachment of DubYa over the USAPA and a host of other issues. (We all know this happy event has a snowball’s chance in hell of happening while his own party controls all three branches of government, but hey, a boy can dream.) And the number of anti-Patriot Act resolutions passed nationally has recently topped 400, including five statewide resolutions.
Not surprisingly, the Bush administration’s fans in the right-wing chattering classes have pounced on librarians and the ALA over the flap. To the people who equate any criticism of DubYa or his policies as traitors to America, the entire library profession now constitutes a veritable Fifth Column of America-haters.
Back in 2003, when this issue first made national headlines, it was the National Review’s Rich Lowry who lead the smear campaign, excoriating librarians over their opposition to Section 215 (and also throwing in a few other conservative myths, such as the idea that librarians have intentionally turned libraries into de facto homeless shelters and porno stores. He also joked that we should all be killed.) This year, the administration’s main water carrier on this issue is internment camp apologist Michelle Malkin, who refers to ALA opponents of Bush policies as “moonbats” and “Bush-deranged bigots” and suggests that we’ve been “breathing too much photocopier fluid.”
Who would’ve thought that little ol’ librarians could engender so much vitriol from flame-throwing reactionary pundits? In my opinion, it’s a badge of honor. I eagerly await the Ann Coulter column lamenting the fact that Timothy McVeigh didn’t set off his bombs at the ALA convention.